Energy Retrofitting to Houses
Part one of a two part blog on retrofitting of existing houses
Today there is a huge industry insulating existing houses with claims that wall insulation, roof insulation will reduce your heat loss and reduce your heating bills
Cavity wall insulation, loft insulation, and external wall insulation all harbour good tidings.
Government grants have been trumpeted as a way of offsetting costs and with it reducing energy and carbon footprint.
In the midst of all the hoopla surrounding the benefits of insulation retrofitting, the elephant in the room has not been answered and in some cases not yet seen.
Is insulation retrofitting really reducing the energy costs of existing houses or is it a giant mistake.
As with any juggernaut the danger is that when it gathers speed and especially a government backed juggernaut it is hard or impossible to stop.
Let’s look at each type of insulation system.
Cavity fill
The rationale of filling the cavity with insulation appears to be sound but it doesn’t offer any solutions to cold bridging within the cavity from floors, windows or the roof.
Thus the wall fabric which in many cases has the most basic type of insulation probably badly fitted is now treated with an insulation that may or may not fill the cavity (there is no way of knowing).
Even if we concede that the cavity is fully filled what real improvement to the wall U value has occurred.
Applying the U value calculations may show a marginal improvement in the overall wall U value but as it doesn’t affect the cold bridging issues it has actually exacerbated the problem as perversely increasing fabrics U value will increase the heat transfer at cold bridging locations.
This also results in lower temperatures at cold bridge locations causing condensation problems.
I am not saying that cavity fill is useless but without proper analysis its effectiveness in reducing fabric heat loss is suspect.
External wall insulation
Again the rationale of using external insulation looks sound but on examination it also has more questions than it answers.
Wall insulation usually starts at DPC level which is between 150mm to 200m above ground level and stops at roof soffit level.
The insulation that is used is relatively poor thus the U value is not greatly enhanced but this is the least of the problems facing external insulation.
The fact that the upper and lower parts of the wall fabric are un-insulated means that the insulation is either entirely useless or greatly diminished.
Again with the exception of joists at 1st floor no system reduces or eliminates cold bridging.
I suspect little or no technical data exists in determining before or after heat losses of external wall insulation systems.
The claims of a large drop in wall U values are simply not true.
Attic Insulation
This is perhaps the only type of insulation that makes any sense.
And unfortunately it also suffers from the dreaded cold bridge problems at the roof perimeter.
But in saying that the relative cost in insulating the attic is small and some reduction of heat loss is possible.
Conclusion
The problems with arguing against the merits of insulation is not that the insulations don’t work but that they cannot be expected to work in a retrofit situation without addressing the other basic problems of cold bridging and air tightness.
That hasn’t stopped insulation companies selling insulation by the truck load but to what use.
The government’s logic is that insulation is good so why not induce the public to buy it with grants.
That most of the systems are untried in recording heat loss reductions and cannot scientifically say what heat loss reduction has occurred leads me to suspect that none of them actually work or work anything like as effective as claimed.
The second part of this blog is concerned with effective ways to reduce heat loss without using insulation.